Churchill Downs Inc (CDI), the owner of the Kentucky Derby, and the New York Racing Association (NYRA) are taking legal action against the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA) for allegedly threatening to suspend their racing activities due to the nonpayment of almost $5 million in fees. The racetrack operators contend that HISA has trampled their constitutional rights.
The legal action alleges that the national racing authority HISA has allowed the plaintiffs 20 days to settle the fees. After that date, they will be prohibited from providing racing for every day the payment is overdue, according to the lawsuit.
CDI and the NYRA contend that these fees are "unlawfully enforced" and contravene the US Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
‘Unauthorized Charges’
The core of the complaint is that HISA has altered its approach to evaluating fees, which previously relied exclusively on the number of starts organized by racetrack owners.
Currently, the calculation relies equally on starts and purses, split 50-50. The lawsuit claims that CDI and NYRA are disproportionately affected, as they provide higher prize money than the majority of other operators.
In a statement released on Friday, HISA declared it would “vigorously defend itself” against the lawsuit and oppose “the companies’ efforts to evade paying their rightful portion of HISA’s fees.” The agency indicates that the evaluation method has received approval from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The fees are meant to guarantee that HISA is sufficiently financed "and capable of properly managing the Anti-Doping and Medication Control Program and the Racetrack Safety Program, as mandated by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act,” stated the regulator.
HISA is a private, self-regulating body established by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act, which was enacted by President Trump in 2020. The Act created consistent safety standards across the nation for the horse racing industry, which was previously governed by separate states. HISA was created to regulate the sector and implement the new regulations.
Magistrate and Panel
These regulations have been unwelcomed by numerous state racing commissions, which are accustomed to operating in their own manner. They argue that enhanced testing is costly, and without a federal funding system to back HISA's mandates, the expenses fall on the industry.
CDI and NYRA additionally argue that HISA has employed its own internal enforcement procedure to conclude that Churchill Downs and the NYRA owe it millions and are subject to bans.
The lawsuit claims that a private entity's assumption of judicial powers breaches Article III of the US Constitution. The plaintiffs contend that this issue ought to be resolved in a federal court.
